Intercourse as a female resource for social exchange in heterosexual interactions
"Men have a constant desire to have sex with many diverse partners, to increase the likelihood of passing on their genes/seed. This is all subconscious however, and is translated to the individual as "being horny", "just wanting to get laid", etc. To achieve this goal, men will lower any possible standards just for sexual gratification. It is vastly different for women. Females are subconsciously programmed by nature to only accept the best seed and the best genes. They have to carry the seed inside them for 9 months and have evolved to be able to raise the offspring - so they have also evolved to be gatekeepers to only allow the best possible genes to be passed. Hence, why women will not lower their standards and how even fat, hideous women still want only rich, handsome, alpha type men."
"This simple biological determinism acts out quite literally in the casual encounters section of CL. Make an advertisement as a man requesting for sex, and you'll receive about 10 spam emails from people attempting to exploit this biological fact. And perhaps maybe one male, thinking he can convert the horny guy into trying gay sex out of sexual frustration. But what happens if you make an ad as a woman requesting for sex? You will have over 60 replies from real men within an hour. The woman simply has to sift through her choices until she finds the one who is "most attractive, richest, holds most value, etc.". It has nothing to do with the CL section, it's just human nature. This of course happens in clubs, bars, and other places where singles mingle as well.
"What is curious however, is some women's reasoning that there is a "double standard" that exists because men are congratulated for being sexually promiscuous - and women are given negative connotations such as "slut" or "whore". Why some women can't understand this very simple concept has always baffled men. Males have to compete with one another to get picked for sex. They have to display that they have the best genes or the most value. Women have to compete too, but only for the very best male
. They can have sex anytime they choose, just not with the best choice. But if they were to lower their standards as men have to do, they would get to pick from a long line of men."
"'Getting laid' is not something that can happen every day for the common Joe. He has to navigate the maze of a woman delicately in social situations to convince her he's the best pick. If a woman goes to a bar, club, or casual encounters looking for sex, and only wants sex, she will have zero problems getting it. Therefore, over time, women have gained a negative connotation, because they are not "beating anyone" or doing anything remotely impressive, they are simply manipulating basic human biology for sexual gratification.
And thus, the term "slut" was manifested. Another point is to think of female prostitution. Is there a reason why the porn industry is so huge but only for (mostly) the male population? Is there a reason female prostitution is a global epidemic, but you don't hear problems about male prostitution? Why a female prostitute can make quite the living, while male prostitution isn't very profitable for the average Joe?"
"Why is that even disgusting women can make pretty good money through heterosexual prostitution, but average men can't? Men could potentially make money though homosexual prostitution but:
1. There isn't as large of a demand for homosexual sex as there is for heterosexual sex (more heterosexuals than homosexuals)
2. Despite a prostitutes first objective, which is to make money, a woman still enjoys sex, and it is reasonable to believe she could
gain heterosexual pleasure/gratification through her clients. Why does a heterosexual male have to be a homosexual prostitute to make money, and heterosexual females get to make money by being heterosexual prostitutes?
So if you were to break it down into simple economics, regarding heterosexual relations, women govern the supply and men generate the demand.
And thus from that you can infer many implications. If male sexuality is inherently worthless, then why do women think there is a double standard when it comes to promiscuity? It actually takes some sort of skill level for a man to take his worthless sexuality, and have sex with many women. It's not difficult for a woman to take her valuable sexuality, and find many male sex partners. So it's obvious why women are called "sluts" for having many partners, and why men are praised."
Original source from:
Edited by Anonymous
Edit: Aihetta on näemmä käsitelty laajemminkin jopa suomalaisten taholta.
Lähteissä mainittu luonnollisesti Baumeisterin tutkielmat.