IRC-Galleria

Oho, I was taken into the macroreview of the new album from Britney Spears (is it out yet, anyway?).. I'm now listening to it.. By third song it's actually better than I expected. I'll probably put in my MP4 player and listen to it on the way and in Tampere today.

So far..

Womanizer.. Terribly corny, but OK. Quite what Britney has sounded like in the latest years..
Circus.. Basicly the same as Womanizer. Even sounds the same.
Out From Under.. Not bad, but still kind of corny for a ballad.
Kill The Lights.. Sounds pretty much the same as the first two song's. I'm getting bored..
Shattered Glass.. Woohoo, finally something that sounds somehow different. I could easily imagine this song arranged as the 90's pure Britney pop. It would probably sound better..
If U Seek Amy.. Kill me. Sounds like songs 1, 2 and 3.
Unusual You.. Sounds the same as previous songs, too, with bonus- BORING!!
-So far it seems to me that all the songs have exactly the same tempo and exactly the same rythm. Only differ in sound effects and the number of Britney's moans..
Blur.. Finally a tempo change.. OK, they probably should have stuck with the tempo before.. This is so.. Nothing..
Mmm Papi.. I think now I can define the words 'shit pop'. It's stupid.
Mannequin.. Sounds again the same as the first songs.. But those sound effects like 'stuck LP' (or whatever it might be called in English) are just too much, I'm getting pretty aanoyed with them..
Lace And Leather.. Woohoo, finally a song that has something like a melody..
My Baby.. Oh yes, last-but-one song, time for a typical Britney ballad- just piano and some wannabe dramatic voice.. Just TOO MUCH the same as soo many of what you've heard before..
Radar.. And again the same as the first songs.

No, I think I'm not putting this album in my MP4 player. I'd die. Seriously, I stayed interested over the first four songs and then it was just.. 'Shit.. Shit.. Shit..' Does 'shit' have to be a swear word?? It perfectly describes what I think about the album and I'm getting frustrated by the fact that I actually can't use it..

Alright, God bless Renoise tonight. Any bad the gig might come out, they will save my ears..

I guess I choose wrong ways to ask people for support.. But I can see that it's not only me who has changed. And that it's not only me who has turned the wrong way.

Back to basics..

Come on and show them
Your love
Rip out the wings of a butterfly
For your soul
My love
Rip out the wings of a butterfly..

'Even though my eyes are crying, you deserve a smile.'

Oho. I'm nearly shocked. On MS they published the article about Entiwne and they are also publishing the one about HCSS. Now I've done one about Europe going to the studio again, so I hope there's no doubt about publishing that..

But still I don't think I'm gonna stay in the team for long. I guess there are way too many things that go against my mind for me to stay.. Well, let's see if they're gonna convince me..

And the Valo gig after tomorrow. Yay.

23.1. TAP, Kustaa
15.2. Renoise + Monday + Heijaste, Klubi
12.2. Lovex + 4Lyn, Hki
13.2. Renoise + PSG + Naughty Whisper, Vastavirta Klubi
28.2. Renoise + Apulanta, Tre-Talo
24.4. Entwine, Nokia
20.6. TAP, ?

..coming soon..

3.12. Renoise, Valo
7.12. Bandage Klubi
7.12. TAP + Renoise, Kaijakka
9.12. Manzana, Sputnik
13.12. Backyard Babies, Klubi
--
21.-29.12. Joululomalle kotiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiin!! :-)
--
29.12. Esse, Hki
30.12. HIM, Pakkahuone

x))

I just got another reason to think about quitting MS. It's not that I'm really pissed off this time, but that I don't like some things that are considered normal there..
I just got an e-mail from one of the correctors (yeah, the one who made the grammar mistakes in my article and, by the way, made some new in another article) with some little pieces of technical advice. OK, I accept that. But after that I went throught the article again (btw. 'news' piece published 5 days after being submitted- is there any point of publishing it any more then?) and found out that he had also changed the structure of the article. Not even that would be such a problem, but what I don't like is that he made absolutely unnecessary changes and with them the article looks weird. Not regarding the fact that I don't like the style he made it into at all.

I keep complaining here without having the guts to say it to them. Probably because I'm still a newbie there. Basically I'm just waiting for my mind to let me know what to do- to quit or not to quit?

'The advantage of having two hearts is that when one is broken, the other one still stays whole.'

Not that this idea would have any special personal meaning for me at the moment, but I like it.

No, I really won't work at this site for long. There's not a day that someone wouldn't piss me off.

Yeah. For two days I was waiting for the correction of my articles in the end to find out that the corrector has made extra grammar mistakes into it.. Woohoo.